Body
  • 1
    henrystar

    Richard 8:03 pm on April 26, 2012 - 23 days ago

    Yawn. Anything up with AAPL? Seems very quiet here…….

     
  • 2
    henrystar

    Richard 8:15 pm on March 20, 2012 - 60 days ago

    You know me. Age 72. AAPL since $4/share. But, I am a scientist, not an investment person. I’ll not sell my AAPL, no way José! But I want to put the rest of my retirement into something that at least will not lose value. Right now it is all in Vanguard TIPS. That has done really well over the last little while! Should I switch it all to Treasuries? What should I do? (I tend to do everything to excess, e.g. putting ALL my IRA into AAPL under President Ford). Thanks for any advice!

     
    • conshmillo

      conshmillo 10:10 pm on March 20, 2012 60 days ago

      Kind of late but you would be better off to have Roth IRA. That way you pay taxes on deposit, not on withdrawal.

    • henrystar

      Richard 10:43 pm on March 20, 2012 60 days ago

      Thanks; you are right, of course. I was too late to it.

  • 3
    henrystar

    Richard 11:56 pm on February 10, 2012 - 99 days ago

    I just read some analysts’ objections: the next gadget that hits may be some other company, and AAPL is dust. I won’t bother to comment on that, for this board! It reminded me that my grandfather lived next door to a carriage manufacturer in Oshawa, Ontario. The guy decided to build horseless carriages! My grandfather felt it would fail, because there were not enough lower-class people able enough to be chauffeurs. Not a joke. The company became General Motors of Canada. And I still have my grandfather’s buggy whip! Again, not a joke.

     
    • Zee

      Zee 9:56 am on February 11, 2012 98 days ago

      I have a book that I highly value and recommend. It’s written by Christopher Cerf: When The Experts Speak. Check it out because I know you’ll enjoy it. Cheers.

      • Zee

        Zee 10:03 am on February 11, 2012 98 days ago

        Sorry. It’s called: The Experts Speak.

        • henrystar

          Richard 11:18 am on February 11, 2012 98 days ago

          Thanks, I just ordered it. Sounds great! Dick

  • henrystar

    Richard 1:24 am on January 10, 2012 - 131 days ago

    Apple Hotels – wouldn’t it be great? I am in a non-Apple hotel at the moment, at a scientific meeting. When you come in the door, the light switch is near the door but is painted the same color as the walls so you can’t see it. The lamps by the bed have an intricate structure to keep you busy trying to find the switch. But the switch, believe it or not, is not on the lamp, it is on a separate black box about a foot away from the lamp itself. The black box has a handy tiny light on it so you can find it in the dark, once you know – and have been able to remember – that it exists. As for electricity, I am typing this on a table across the room from the desk, because the one (1) available electric outlet at the desk I am using for my iPhone charger. Can you imagine how Sir Jony Ive feels when he visits a hotel, ANY hotel? Hotels are a nightmare of non-design. And of course I am paying a huge sum per day to connect to the internet. This hotel even offers different rates (at different prices) if e.g. you want to game. Hey, I am old enough that I remember stopping at a hotel that advertised in neon lights, “Free TV. Rooms $4 and $6.” When I asked her what the difference was, she explained that the $6 rooms have the free TV. Not a joke! And at that time (you can tell how long ago it was from the room price) there were plenty of motel rooms where you had to feed quarters into the TV. Hey, why not have coin meters on the hot water taps in hotel rooms? Anyone else got hotel horror stories?

     
  • henrystar

    Richard 11:48 am on December 3, 2011 - 168 days ago

    Verizon + Cable:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/verizon-wireless-makes-marketing-airwave-deal-with-three-cable-companies/2011/12/02/gIQARvPYMO_story.html?hpid=z1

    What are the implications for Apple’s plans?

     
  • henrystar

    Richard 1:15 pm on November 23, 2011 - 178 days ago

    I’ve never even experienced Siri, but she’s got under my skin: as I write my fortran programs on my mac, I have the program write on the screen “Siri has finished plotting your data” when the program is done. There is nothing like personality! I think Siri is going to make me money on my AAPL shares. Current market stinks.

     
  • 2
    henrystar

    Richard 10:57 pm on November 15, 2011 - 186 days ago

    This seems to say that we AAPL investors are in good shape:

    http://seekingalpha.com/article/308145-can-google-catch-apple-s-siri?source=yahoo

    Yeah for Siri!

     
    • Birra

      Birra 12:19 am on November 16, 2011 186 days ago

      Agree, Apple really caught Google flat footed. What a conundrum, push their terrible voice apps with smoke and mirrors and lose their revenue base or try to keep text searching relevant.

      Just think what Google could have had if they hadn’t back stabbed Apple. They could have been the app provider for all these Siri queries. Apple would have had no need to do their own mapping which will be the next loss for Google. Apple really had no interest in advertising and search engines, but now they do.

      LOL

    • Nicu

      Nicu 10:09 pm on November 18, 2011 183 days ago

  • henrystar

    Richard 10:36 am on November 12, 2011 - 189 days ago

    I found this useful:

    http://www.cnn.com/2011/11/11/opinion/rushkoff-jobs-apple/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

    I myself am computer savvy, BUT I have no interest in computers which is why I love the Mac. On the Mac I can write my Intel Fortran programs and run them without thinking about computers. Except when I have to upgrade my fortran and installing is not like just getting an app. Unix crap that I hate. Which is sad – I don’t see why there could not be a fortran app for the Mac – anyone up for it?

     
  • 4
    henrystar

    Richard 11:43 am on November 9, 2011 - 192 days ago

    From the web:
    ZDNet is reporting that Adobe has announced to its partners that the company has discontinued development on Flash Player for mobile browsers. The news comes roughly a year and a half after the publication of Steve Jobs’ “Thoughts on Flash” open letter, laying out his thoughts on the use of Flash in mobile devices and explaining why Apple would not support Flash on their mobile devices.
    Instead of working on mobile Flash, Adobe plans to continue developing its tools to produce applications that work on mobile app stores, including Apple’s App Store.
    From Adobe’s announcement:
    Our future work with Flash on mobile devices will be focused on enabling Flash developers to package native apps with Adobe AIR for all the major app stores. We will no longer adapt Flash Player for mobile devices to new browser, OS version or device configurations. Some of our source code licensees may opt to continue working on and releasing their own implementations. We will continue to support the current Android and PlayBook configurations with critical bug fixes and security updates.
    ZDNet notes that the announcement should go public on Adobe’s website in the next day.

     
    • Senator Gronk

      Senator Gronk 1:15 pm on November 9, 2011 192 days ago

      I love it. So hard to type when I’m dancing in the street. ; )

    • JPWatkins

      JPWatkins 4:30 pm on November 9, 2011 192 days ago

      Reason wins out.
      “But now how are we more sophisticated users going to be able to to access the full capabilities of the internet?”

    • GotWake

      GotWake 10:15 pm on November 10, 2011 191 days ago

      I had to laugh when I saw this headline pop up on my screen. I just wish Steve had been around to see it. I want to see all of the Executives from the different companies come forward and talk about “using the full web” now. Flash sucked and Steve knew it. He wasn’t willing to compromise to have shit on his creations.

    • GotWake

      GotWake 7:23 am on November 11, 2011 190 days ago

      Only the idiots at RIM would continue to move forward trying to implement Flash in mobile. Even freakin Adobe knows it’s time to stop. :)

      “As an Adobe source code licensee, we will continue to work on and release our own implementations. RIM remains committed to delivering an uncompromised Web browsing experience to our customers, including native support for Adobe Flash Player on our BlackBerry PlayBook tablet (similar to a desktop PC browser), as well as HTML5 support on both our BlackBerry smartphone and PlayBook browsers,” the company said, adding that it was “pleased” at Adobe’s renewed focus on HTML5.”

      http://allthingsd.com/20111109/so-now-what-will-ipad-rivals-say-in-their-commercials/

  • 4
    henrystar

    Richard 10:36 am on October 16, 2011 - 216 days ago

    I wanted to see what was up on the pathetic google AAPL page, but it no longer loads, as of yesterday. Have they finally pulled the plug?

     
    • Nicu

      Nicu 10:40 am on October 16, 2011 216 days ago

      I have just loaded it 1 minute ago.

    • henrystar

      Richard 10:43 am on October 16, 2011 216 days ago

      That is strange! I don’t see it here at home, and I just tried on my machine at work (via Timbuktu) and only got an error message there! Not that I am missing anything, of course!

    • JPWatkins

      JPWatkins 9:33 pm on October 16, 2011 216 days ago

      It has always been spotty. Comes and goes at the whim of a server (or something.)
      I always figured that along with all the spam, trolls, sumer, et al, it was simply a reflection of Google’s lack of interest and commitment. After all, as long as it provides a place for an ad or two, it’s served their purpose even if it doesn’t serve purposes of the users.

      • chach17

        chach17 1:10 pm on October 17, 2011 215 days ago

        Makes me wonder if Sumer is somehow banned from joining this site.

c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
esc
cancel